Trump’s Gaza Takeover Plan: A Dangerous Geopolitical Move

By announcing a plan to take over the Gaza Strip and displace two million Palestinians under the guise of redevelopment, U.S. President Donald Trump has crossed yet another line in his history of controversial geopolitical moves. His assertion that Egypt and Jordan should absorb the displaced Palestinians is nothing short of a brazen disregard for international law, human rights, and historical grievances. The plan, unveiled alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is not only reckless but sets a dangerous precedent for future global conflicts.

US President Donald Trump announcing to take over the Gaza strip

A Pattern of Imperial Thinking

Trump's proposal to seize Gaza is just the latest in a long list of territorial ambitions. Previously, he floated the idea of purchasing Greenland from Denmark and showed interest in controlling the Panama Canal. His vision of renaming the Gulf of Mexico further illustrates an outdated colonial mindset that disregards national sovereignty. The difference in Gaza’s case, however, is that the plan entails mass displacement, ethnic cleansing, and forced relocation, which could spark irreversible consequences for regional stability.

Why Can the U.S. and Israel Do What Others Cannot?

The hypocrisy of Trump’s plan is glaring. The United States and its allies condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine as an illegal act of aggression, while simultaneously pushing forward their own occupation agenda in the Middle East. Similarly, the West opposes China's claim over Taiwan, citing international law, yet Trump and Netanyahu seem to believe they have the authority to dictate the fate of Gaza’s two million inhabitants. Who granted the U.S. and Israel the right to determine where people should live? If territorial expansion by force is unacceptable for Russia and China, why should it be acceptable for the U.S. and Israel?

Exploiting Muslim Disunity

Trump and Netanyahu have calculated that Muslim countries are too divided to mount an effective response. History has proven that many Arab and Muslim-majority nations have prioritized economic and diplomatic ties with the U.S. and Israel over Palestinian rights. During Israel’s relentless bombardment of Gaza and Lebanon, several Muslim states chose to remain silent or align themselves with U.S. interests. This lack of unity emboldens the U.S. and Israel to pursue further actions with minimal resistance.

The most alarming question remains: If this plan is executed and Muslim nations fail to act, what’s next? After Gaza, the next target will likely be Iran. Once that battlefront is opened, which country will be next in line for U.S.-Israeli expansionism? The lesson here is simple: acquiescence today means vulnerability tomorrow.

International Outrage, But Will It Matter?

The international community has strongly opposed Trump’s plan. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt have all rejected the displacement of Palestinians, labeling it a blatant violation of international law. Saudi Arabia has made it clear that it will not normalize relations with Israel without a two-state solution. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has firmly stated, “We will not allow any infringement of the rights of our people, which we have struggled for decades and made great sacrifices to achieve.”

Even within the United States, the proposal has been met with fierce criticism. Senator Chris Murphy called the idea a “bad, sick joke,” warning that a U.S. invasion of Gaza would lead to massive troop casualties and prolonged warfare in the Middle East.

Russia, a key global player, has also condemned the plan. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused Israel of attempting to take full control of the occupied West Bank while simultaneously displacing Palestinians from Gaza. The Kremlin reinforced its stance that the only viable resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a two-state solution, aligning with United Nations resolutions.

Practical Challenges and Geopolitical Consequences

Beyond the moral and legal implications, Trump’s plan is riddled with logistical nightmares. How does the U.S. intend to manage security in an area as volatile as Gaza? What will happen to Hamas and other resistance groups? How will the international community react if forced displacement is carried out in defiance of global opposition?

Moreover, this move threatens ongoing ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas. Any attempt to forcibly remove Palestinians from Gaza will shatter already fragile diplomatic efforts and invite further resistance. Instead of fostering peace, this strategy will likely embolden radical elements, worsening the cycle of violence.

The World Cannot Stand Idle

Trump’s reckless proposal is not just about Gaza—it is a test to see how far the U.S. and Israel can go without meaningful repercussions. The lack of serious consequences for past transgressions has emboldened this push toward further land grabs and ethnic displacement.

The world must respond decisively. Muslim countries, in particular, cannot afford to be silent spectators. Failure to act now will only pave the way for further encroachments—whether in Iran, Lebanon, or beyond. It is imperative for nations that claim to support Palestinian rights to back their words with action. The Palestinian people have suffered enough from decades of occupation, blockade, and war. The world must ensure that history does not repeat itself through another forced displacement, this time under the pretext of redevelopment.

The international community must remember: when one group’s homeland is taken today, another’s may be taken tomorrow. The silence of the world in the face of oppression is not neutrality—it is complicity.