India Summons Pak Envoy, All-Party Meet Today

India’s Strategic Retaliation After Pahalgam Carnage: Indus Waters Treaty Suspended, Diplomatic Ties with Pakistan Scaled Down

 

In a decisive and unprecedented response to the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, where four gunmen targeted and killed 26 Indian tourists and injured 20 others, the Indian government has launched a full-spectrum diplomatic and strategic offensive against Pakistan. The attack, marked by a chilling selection of victims based on religious identity, has once again underscored the long-standing issue of cross-border terrorism sponsored by Pakistan as an instrument of asymmetric warfare.

In a development with far-reaching consequences, New Delhi suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), a historic water-sharing agreement signed in 1960 under the aegis of the World Bank. This marks the first time India has officially halted cooperation under the treaty, which had until now endured wars and diplomatic ruptures. The suspension sends an unmistakable signal—not just to Islamabad but also to the international community—that India’s patience is no longer infinite when it comes to terror emanating from Pakistani soil.

Following the attack, India wasted no time in summoning Pakistan’s High Commissioner, Saad Ahmad Warraich. He was handed a formal demarche along with a notice declaring Pakistan’s military attachés in New Delhi as persona non grata. India has ordered the expulsion of Pakistan’s defence, naval, and air advisors, while simultaneously withdrawing its own military personnel from Islamabad. All associated staff are to leave within a week. These actions represent a sharp downgrading of diplomatic ties and come with a broader recalibration of India’s approach to Pakistan’s military-diplomatic channels, which New Delhi increasingly views as compromised by duplicity and hostility.

Simultaneously, Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a high-level meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), where Union Ministers Amit Shah, Rajnath Singh, and S. Jaishankar discussed a suite of punitive measures, backed by the security establishment. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is also set to lead an all-party meeting to build national consensus and brief the opposition on the evolving Indo-Pak stance. The meeting signals both transparency in governance and the gravity with which the Modi government views Pakistan’s continued use of terrorism as a foreign policy lever.

In a sharp rebuke to people-to-people initiatives, India announced the closure of the Integrated Check Post at Attari—the last remaining land route for ordinary movement between the two nations. Pakistani nationals currently in India have been directed to return home by May 1, after which overland access will be suspended indefinitely. Furthermore, all SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) privileges for Pakistani citizens have been revoked. These measures effectively dismantle the limited people-to-people engagement that still existed between the two countries.

India and Pakistan will also reduce their respective High Commission staff strength from 55 to 30 by the same deadline, reflecting the plummeting bilateral trust. This is not merely symbolic—it denotes a significant freeze in official interactions and intelligence-sharing mechanisms, which were already under considerable strain.

The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, however, stands out as the most significant escalation. The Treaty had survived multiple wars, including the 1965 and 1971 conflicts, and was often cited as an example of functional diplomacy even amidst enmity. Its suspension signals a departure from India’s traditional restraint. It places immense pressure on Pakistan’s agrarian economy, heavily dependent on the western rivers of the Indus system. New Delhi has now signalled it will revisit its approach to river water allocations unless Islamabad dismantles the infrastructure of terrorism operating from its territory.

Predictably, Islamabad has reacted with alarm. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif convened an emergency meeting of the National Security Committee (NSC), a platform typically reserved for wartime decision-making and existential crises. Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar lashed out at New Delhi, calling the moves “unserious” and “reactionary”, while denying any Pakistani involvement in the Pahalgam carnage. He claimed India had failed to produce conclusive evidence and accused it of scapegoating Pakistan in times of internal security challenges.

However, Pakistan’s repeated denials hold diminishing value in the face of mounting international intelligence linking Pakistan-based terror outfits—like The Resistance Front, a known front for the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba—to multiple attacks on Indian soil. India’s decision to escalate is rooted not just in outrage over Pahalgam, but also in a calculated belief that its tolerance for “strategic patience” has been systematically abused.

The Indian security apparatus has been placed on the highest state of alert. A fresh National Investigation Agency (NIA) team is on the ground in Pahalgam, coordinating with local authorities to trace the attack’s masterminds and identify their handlers. Simultaneously, Indian diplomatic missions are being tasked with reviving efforts for international cooperation on extraditing known terrorists and proscribing Pakistan-based terror groups under global conventions.

New Delhi’s message is unequivocal: it will no longer allow political ambiguity or diplomatic niceties to shield Pakistan’s support for terrorism. With the Indus Waters Treaty now in abeyance, military attachés expelled, and diplomatic ties downgraded, a new phase of Indo-Pak relations has begun—one in which New Delhi seeks to redefine the cost of cross-border terrorism through calibrated, strategic pressure.